If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() American Journal of TransplantationVolume 6 Issue 1, Pages 150 - 160 Published Online: 13 Dec 2005 © 2010 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 573K) | Supporting Information | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Noninvasive Discrimination of Rejection in Cardiac Allograft Recipients Using Gene Expression Profiling M. C. Deng and H. J. Eisen contributed equally to this work. Copyright 2006 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons KEYWORDS Allogeneic • biological markers • gene expression profiling • graft rejection • heart transplantation • immune response genes • immunologic • immunologic monitoring • transplantation ABSTRACTRejection diagnosis by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is invasive, expensive and variable. We investigated gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to discriminate ISHLT grade 0 rejection (quiescence) from moderate/severe rejection (ISHLT ≥3A). Patients were followed prospectively with blood sampling at post-transplant visits. Biopsies were graded by ISHLT criteria locally and by three independent pathologists blinded to clinical data. Known alloimmune pathways and leukocyte microarrays identified 252 candidate genes for which real-time PCR assays were developed. An 11 gene real-time PCR test was derived from a training set (n = 145 samples, 107 patients) using linear discriminant analysis (LDA), converted into a score (0–40), and validated prospectively in an independent set (n = 63 samples, 63 patients). The test distinguished biopsy-defined moderate/severe rejection from quiescence (p = 0.0018) in the validation set, and had agreement of 84% (95% CI 66% C94%) with grade ISHLT ≥3A rejection. Patients >1 year post-transplant with scores below 30 (approximately 68% of the study population) are very unlikely to have grade ≥3A rejection (NPV = 99.6%). Gene expression testing can detect absence of moderate/severe rejection, thus avoiding biopsy in certain clinical settings. Additional clinical experience is needed to establish the role of molecular testing for clinical event prediction and immunosuppression management. Received 22 April 2005, revised and accepted for publication 7 October 2005 |