ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volume 46 Issue 1, Pages 49 - 51

Published Online: 25 Jan 2006

Journal compilation © 2009 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 61K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Short Communication
Treatment of rectovaginal fistula: A 5-year review
Damian CASADESUS, Luis VILLASANA, Ines M. SANCHEZ, Hector DIAZ, Mariano CHAVEZ and Angelina DIAZ
Coloproctology Department, Calixto Garcia University Hospital, J y Universidad, Vedado, Havana, Cuba
Correspondence: Mr Damian Casadesus, Washington 156, Infanta y Churrucas, Cerro, Havana, Cuba. Email: dcasadesus@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2006 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences

This paper presents a chart review of 17 patients who had been treated for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) from 1996 to 2000. In most cases (13; 76.5%), the fistula was the result of post-surgical complications. Following vaginal mucosa advancement flap repair or repair after conversion to a fourth-degree perineal laceration, 16 (94%) of the rectovaginal fistulae (during the first attempted repair or after failed treatment) were successfully treated. In all patients but one, faecal diversion was avoided. In two patients, fistulography was both a diagnostic procedure and the method of treatment.


Received 14 June 2005; accepted 02 September 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00514.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Announcing
Early View