If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Biological Journal of the Linnean SocietySee Also: Volume 88 Issue 3, Pages 403 - 411 Published Online: 15 Jun 2006 © 2010 The Linnean Society of London Published on behalf of the Linnean Society of London
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 204K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Tempo and constraint of adaptive evolution in Escherichia coli (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriales) Copyright 2006 The Linnean Society of London KEYWORDS adaptation • macroevolution • microevolution • mesoevolution • mode • fitness ABSTRACTThe utility of maintaining distinct macroevolutionary and microevolutionary theory has long been debated. Although population and quantitative genetics provide an extensive list of microevolutionary forces that might explain macroevolutionary trends, studies of these processes are temporally limited and may fail to fully explain macroevolutionary patterns. To understand the relationship between the macroevolutionary pattern and microevolutionary forces, we must first understand how different populations respond to a given novel environment over hundreds or even thousands of generations. This study details the tempo of fitness gain over 2000 generations in four replicate lineages from each of five different ancestral Escherichia coli clones. Adaptive tempo was measured in the evolved lineages and ancestry was a significant source of variation in that tempo. Microevolutionary theory suggests that adaptive tempo should be proportional to the distance from an optimum phenotype. Demographic fitness measures allowed estimation of the ancestral distance from an optimum in the present study. Ancestral distance from an optimum was significantly related to adaptive tempo but it did not account for all of the observed variation. This suggests the existence of both ancestor and clade specific constraints. Understanding the role of such constraints is critical to both microevolutionary and macroevolutionary theory. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 88, 403–411. Received 4 October 2004; accepted for publication 5 December 2005 |