HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE

doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Systems Maintenance, Monday, 15th February 2010

Wiley InterScience

Personnel Psychology

Volume 59 Issue 3, Pages 501 - 528

Published Online: 17 Aug 2006

Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile Download Citation Request Permissions

Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 212K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE

JAMES COMBS ¹ , YONGMEI LIU ¹ ANGELA HALL ² DAVID KETCHEN ³

¹ Department of Management Florida State University
² Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Real Estate, and Business Law Florida State University
³ Department of Management Auburn University

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to James Combs, Florida State University–Management, College of Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110; Jcombs@fsu.edu.

We are grateful to John Delery, Jerry Ferris, Jack Fiorito, Mark Huselid, and Micki Kacmar for their assistance and insight.

ABSTRACT

Although there is growing evidence that high performance work practices (HPWPs) affect organizational performance, varying sample characteristics, research designs, practices examined, and organizational performance measures used has led extant findings to vary dramatically, making the size of the overall effect difficult to estimate. We use meta-analysis to estimate the effect size and test whether effects are larger for (a) HPWP systems versus individual practices, (b) operational versus financial performance measures, and (c) manufacturing versus service organizations. Statistical aggregation of 92 studies reveals an overall correlation that we estimate at .20. Also, the relationship is stronger when researchers examine systems of HPWPs and among manufacturers, but it appears invariant across performance measures. We use our findings as a basis to offer 4 suggestions intended to shape research practices such that future meta-analyses might answer today's emerging questions.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x About DOI