ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 88K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The indoor use of plastic sheeting pre-impregnated with insecticide for control of malaria vectors
A. Diabate 1 , F. Chandre 2 , M. Rowland 3 , R. N'guessan 3 , S. Duchon 4 , K. R. Dabire 1 and J.-M. Hougard 2
  1 Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
  2  Institut de Recherche pour le Développement et Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Benin
  3 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  4 Laboratoire de Lutte contre les Insectes Nuisibles, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France
Corresponding Author A. Diabate, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Entomologie, IRSS/Centre Muraz, BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Tel.: +226 20970102; Fax: +226 20970457; E-mail: a_diabate@hotmail.com
Copyright 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
experimental huts • Anopheles gambiae • insecticide treated plastic sheeting • pyrethroid

Summary

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of permethrin-treated plastic sheeting (ITPS) applied as a lining to the ceiling or walls of rooms against pyrethroid-susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae.

Method Overnight tests were carried out in veranda-trap experimental huts in Vallée du Kou, where two molecular forms of A. gambiae, S and M, occur. The S form is mostly pyrethroid resistant due to the kdr mechanism, and the M form is mostly kdr susceptible. A variety of ITPS covered surfaces were tested, ranging from ceiling only to all walls plus ceiling covered.

Results ITPS had a major effect on the mortality of mosquitoes, the proportion killed being dependent upon the surface area covered. Homozygotes for kdr resistance showed lower rates of mortality than did heterozygotes or homozygotes for susceptibility. Deterred entry of mosquitoes and inhibition of blood feeding were also correlated with surface area covered. The mode of action and efficacy of ITPS seems to bear closer resemblance to that induced by indoor residual spraying (IRS) than to that induced by insecticide-treated nets.

Conclusions ITPS might be conceived as being equivalent to long-lasting or permanent IRS but without some of the operational constraints normally associated with spraying. High coverage of ITPS could potentially have a mass population effect on mosquitoes and give rise to long-term community protection against malaria. A phase III trial is justified to assess the acceptability of ITPS and its efficacy against malaria.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01605.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


E-mail alerts
Sign up for e-alerts
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter