If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() FEMS Yeast ResearchVolume 6 Issue 1, Pages 91 - 101 Published Online: 6 Oct 2005 © 2010 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved Published on behalf of the Federation of European Microbiological Societies
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 197K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Metabolic profiling as a tool for revealing Saccharomyces interactions during wine fermentation Copyright
© 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies KEYWORDS wine fermentation • principal-component analysis • ecology • aroma • metabolic profiling •
Saccharomyces bayanus
•
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
ABSTRACTThe multi-yeast strain composition of wine fermentations has been well established. However, the effect of multiple strains of Saccharomyces spp. on wine flavour is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that multiple strains of Saccharomyces grown together in grape juice can affect the profile of aroma compounds that accumulate during fermentation. A metabolic footprint of each yeast in monoculture, mixed cultures or blended wines was derived by gas chromatography – mass spectrometry measurement of volatiles accumulated during fermentation. The resultant ion spectrograms were transformed and compared by principal-component analysis. The principal-component analysis showed that the profiles of compounds present in wines made by mixed-culture fermentation were different from those where yeasts were grown in monoculture fermentation, and these differences could not be produced by blending wines. Blending of monoculture wines to mimic the population composition of mixed-culture wines showed that yeast metabolic interactions could account for these differences. Additionally, the yeast strain contribution of volatiles to a mixed fermentation cannot be predicted by the population of that yeast. This study provides a novel way to measure the population status of wine fermentations by metabolic footprinting. Received 8 March 2005; revised 18 July 2005; accepted 28 July 2005. |