ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Dialectica

Dialectica

Volume 60 Issue 4, Pages 383 - 396

Published Online: 3 Jul 2006

Journal compilation © 2009 Editorial Board of dialectica



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 81K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

What Does the Conservation of Energy Have to Do with Physicalism?
Barbara Montero
   Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA; Email: bmontero@gc.cuny.edu.
Copyright © 2006 The Author. Journal compilation © 2006 Editorial Board of dialectica

Abstract

Abstract1. The argument for physicalism from the conservation of energy2. ACE and transference theories of causation3. ACE s missing premise4. Conservation of energy is superfluousReferences

The conservation of energy law, a law of physics that states that the total energy of any closed system is always conserved, is a bedrock principle that has achieved both broad theoretical and experimental support. Yet if interactive dualism is correct, it is thought that the mind can affect physical objects in violation of the conservation of energy. Thus, some claim, the conservation of energy grounds an argument for physicalism. Although critics of the argument focus on the implausibility of causation requiring the transference of energy, I argue that even if causation requires the transference of energy, once we accept the other required premises of the argument that lie behind any supposed argument from the conservation of energy the law of the conservation of energy is revealed as irrelevant to the question of whether the mental is physical.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1746-8361.2006.01073.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


IT'S TIME TO RENEW

DLTC

It’s time to renew your subscription to Dialectica.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.