If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Clinical and Experimental DermatologyVolume 31 Issue 4, Pages 503 - 508 Published Online: 16 May 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists An Official Journal of the British Association of Dermatologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 133K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Clinical dermatology • Review article Rituximab in refractory autoimmune bullous diseases Copyright 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Summary
Treatment of autoimmune blistering diseases consists of systemic glucocorticosteroids usually in combination with additional immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil or immunomodulators such as dapsone, antibiotics, intravenous immunoglobulins, and immunoadsorption. In some patients, these treatment regimens are not sufficient to control disease activity and/or lead to intolerable adverse events. Rituximab, originally developed for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, is an anti-CD20 humanized monoclonal antibody leading to transitory B-cell depletion. For this indication, rituximab is widely employed, and severe side-effects rarely observed. Subsequently, the B-cell-depleting effect of rituximab has been exploited successfully in various autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune blistering diseases. Here, we review the effect of rituximab in such diseases. To date, application of rituximab has been reported in 26 treatment-resistant patients with the vulgaris, foliaceus, and paraneoplastic variants of pemphigus as well as in bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. All but a single patient showed clinical improvement with reduction of lesion formation. In about a third, a clinical remission requiring further immunsuppressive medication was achieved, and in about a quarter, complete remission was induced. In addition, the mode of action and adverse events of rituximab as well as adjuvant immunosuppressive treatments, and the effect on levels of circulating autoantibodies in these patients are discussed. Accepted for publication 10 February 2006 |