ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Anaesthesia

Anaesthesia

Volume 61 Issue 6, Pages 571 - 575

Published Online: 12 May 2006

Journal compilation © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 154K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

APPARATUS
Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices*
M. Turner 1 , I. Hodzovic 2 and W. W. Mapleson 3
  1 Specialist Registrar, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport, NP20 2UB, UK
  2 Senior Lecturer, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Wales College of Medicine ,   3 Emeritus Professor, Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
Correspondence to Dr M. Turner E-mail: matthewwturner@hotmail.com

  * Abstract presentation at the Anaesthetic Research Society Meeting, Liverpool, July 2004 (British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 93: 614P).

Copyright 2006 The Authors Journal compilation 2006 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland

Summary

AbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences

The fluid warming capabilities of the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido devices were evaluated in the laboratory with gravity flow via a 14G cannula (1 m head of fluid) and with the fluid bag pressurised to 300 mmHg. The resulting flows (70–450 ml.min−1) were recorded. At a room temperature of 22 °C, no device warmed the fluid to 37 °C. However, the Standard Ranger with gravity flow and the Fluido with both gravity and pressurised flow achieved 35 °C, whereas the Bair Hugger and Hotline with both gravity and pressurised flow, and the Standard Ranger with pressurised flow, achieved only 24–31 °C. However, from the way delivered temperatures changed with flow, we calculated that all four devices would achieve close to 37 °C at the flows specified by the manufacturers: 17, 83, 150 and 800 ml.min−1 for the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido, respectively.


Accepted: 4 January 2006

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04589.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member

ESA 2010 - Register Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Anaesthesia Correspondence site
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now