Electromagnetic Environmental Influences on Implanted Deep Brain Stimulators

doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00068.x

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Neuromodulation

Volume 9 Issue 4, Pages 262 - 269

Published Online: 14 Sep 2006

Published on behalf of

Go to Society Site

< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile Download Citation Request Permissions

Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 108K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Electromagnetic Environmental Influences on Implanted Deep Brain Stimulators

Patric Blomstedt, MD* Mazen Jabre, PharmD ^† Boulos-Paul Bejjani, MD ^†‡ Lars-Owe D. Koskinen, MD, PhD*

*Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden; ^† Parkinson, Memory and Movement Disorders Center, Notre Dame des Secours Hospital, Byblos—Lebanon; ^‡ School of Medicine, Université Saint Esprit, Kaslik, Lebanon

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Patric Blomstedt, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, SE-901 85 Umeå, SWEDEN. Email: patric.blomstedt@neuro.umu.se

KEYWORDS

complications • deep brain stimulation • environmental influence • external interference • hardware

Abstract

Objective. The objective of this study was to report our observations on the external electromagnetic field influences on deep brain stimulation (DBS) in our patient population and how these influences affected our patients' lives and other healthcare-related conditions.

Materials and Methods. We have retrospectively analyzed data concerning the effects of external electromagnetic fields on 172 of our patients implanted with DBS.

Results. Identifiable electromagnetic sources turned the implantable pulse generator (IPG) off in 20 patients. In two patients, these episodes necessitated replacement of the Itrel II IPG (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with the magnetically shielded Kinetra IPG (Medtronic Inc.). Six patients received cardiac pacemakers, leading, in two patients, to interference between the systems. Our experience concerning magnetic resonance imaging, electrocardiogram (ECG), heart defibrillation, electro-cautery, and other sources of electromagnetic interference also is described.

Conclusions. External electromagnetic interference may, in rare cases, constitute a severe threat to the well-being of the patient implanted with a DBS system. Also, malfunction of a DBS system may constitute a medical emergency. Nevertheless, in spite of these external electromagnetic influences, we consider DBS to be a safe method, provided safety protocols are followed, and provided that provider awareness about potential hazards is present.

Submitted: November 28, 2005; Accepted: May 22, 2006

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)

10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00068.x About DOI