ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Insect Science

Insect Science

Volume 13 Issue 1, Pages 61 - 66

Published Online: 30 Jan 2006

© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 417K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Lack of repellency of three commercial ultrasonic devices to the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae)
FANGNENG HUANG 1 and BHADRIRAJU SUBRAMANYAM 2
  1 Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana , and   2 Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
 Correspondence: Fangneng Huang, 404 Life Sciences Building, Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. Tel: 225 578 0111; fax: 225 578 1632; e-mail: fhuang@agcenter.1su.edu
Copyright Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2006
KEYWORDS
Blattella germanica • ultrasonic devices • urban pest management

ABSTRACT

Abstract Three commercial ultrasonic devices (A, B, and C) were tested for their ability to repel the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in Plexiglas® enclosures. Device A generated peak frequencies at 26 kHz and 34 kHz, and produced a 95 ± 1 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at 50 cm distance (0 dB = 20 log10[20 μPa/ 20 μPa]). Device B generated peak frequencies at 27 kHz and 35 kHz, and produced a 92 ± 4 dB SPL. Device C generated a wide range of frequencies between 28–42 kHz and produced an 88 ± 2 dB SPL. Ultrasound from any of the three devices did not demonstrate sufficient repelling ability against the German cockroach in the tests. The result failed to provide evidence that ultrasonic technology could be used as an effective pest management tool to repel or eliminate the German cockroach.


Accepted October 11, 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00069.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Now Available


Access the latest articles online in advance of issue compilation

Latest News & Information
Manuscript Submissions
Sign up here