ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Insect Science

Insect Science

Volume 13 Issue 3, Pages 167 - 177

Published Online: 6 Jun 2006

© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 215K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Resolution of phylogenetic relationships of the major subfamilies of the Delphacidae (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea) using the mitochondrial ribosomal DNA
EDDY DIJKSTRA 1 , MICHEL A. SLOTMAN 1 and RORY J. POST 2
  1 Biosystematics Group, Wageningen University, the Netherlands and   2 The Natural History Museum, London, UK
 Correspondence: Rory J. Post, Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Tel: +442079425593; fax: +44 2079425229; e-mail: r.post@nhm.ac.uk
 

Current address: Eddy Dijkstra, National Plant Protection Service, Department of Entomology, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Michel A. Slotman, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, USA

Copyright Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2006
KEYWORDS
classification • Delphacidae • evolution • Fulgoroidea • Homoptera • mitochondrial DNA • phylogeny • ribosomal DNA

ABSTRACT

Abstract Delphacid relationships from the genus level to the subfamily have been completely resolved (among those taxa examined) using sequence data from the 3'end of the 12S gene. Monophyly of the non-asiracine subfamilies was strongly supported and the asiracine Ugyops was placed in the most basal position of the tree. Support levels for monophyly of the Delphacini increased after weighting transversions more heavily than transitions and after removing the cixiid outgroup from the dataset. Among the Delphacini, Conomelus and Megamelus were more closely related to each other than either was to Chloriona. These results are in agreement with the tree based on morphological characters. However, in contrast to morphological data our results strongly supported a sister group relationship between the Stenocraninae and the Kelisiinae. Although the 12S gene fragment gave some information about the species relationships within Chloriona, neither this fragment nor the 5'end of the 16S gene appear to be very useful for this level. Molecular evolutionary patterns provided evidence that there has been a shift in base composition from T to A during the early evolution of the non-Asiracinae. The non-Asiracinae also had comparatively fast substitution rates and these two observations are possibly correlated. In the 'modern' delphacid Chloriona, the AT content was comparatively low in regions free of constraints but this was not the case for 'non-modern' delphacids. The tRNA for valine has been translocated elsewhere, probably before the Delphacidae and Cixiidae diverged from each other.


Accepted February 28, 2006

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00079.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Now Available


Access the latest articles online in advance of issue compilation

Latest News & Information
Manuscript Submissions
Sign up here