ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Ground Water

Ground Water

Volume 44 Issue 2, Pages 275 - 283

Published Online: 24 Aug 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 National Ground Water Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 228K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Models to Determine First-Order Rate Coefficients from Single-Well Push-Pull Tests
Martin H. Schroth 1 Jonathan D. Istok 2
  1 Corresponding author: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Grabenstrasse 3, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland; (41) 1-633-6039; fax (41) 1-633-1122; martin.schroth@env.ethz.ch
 

2 Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, 202 Apperson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331.

Copyright 2005 National Ground Water Association

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionTheoryComparison of modelsExample applicationReferences

Push-pull tests (PPTs) have been successfully employed to quantify various microbially mediated processes in the subsurface. Current models for determining first-order rate coefficients (k) from PPTs assume complete and instantaneous mixing of injected test solution in the portion of the aquifer investigated by the test, i.e., the system is treated like a well-mixed reactor. Here we present two alternative models to estimate k that are based on different mixing assumptions, i.e., plug-flow and variably mixed reactor models. Rate coefficients estimated by the models were compared using a sensitivity analysis and numerical simulations of PPTs. Results indicated that all models yielded reasonably accurate k estimates (errors < 13%), while best accuracy (errors < 1%) was obtained using the variably mixed reactor model. The well-mixed reactor model generally overestimated true (simulation input) k values, whereas true k values were consistently underestimated by the plug-flow reactor model. However, estimates of k obtained with the latter models bracketed true k values in all cases. As the variably mixed reactor model is more difficult to apply, we suggest using the well-mixed and plug-flow reactor models to obtain intervals for k estimates that will encompass true k values with high certainty. In an example application, we used all models to reanalyze a published PPT data set to obtain k estimates for nitrate consumption in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer. Similar results were obtained for all three models (relative differences < 10% between k estimates), indicating that all three models are robust tools for estimating k values from PPT experimental data.


Received September 2004, accepted March 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00107.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Also of Interest
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Click here for Free Access