ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 160K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Prosecuting 'Gross' Medical Negligence: Manslaughter, Discretion, and the Crown Prosecution Service
Oliver Quick*
  *School of Law, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, England
Oliver.Quick@bristol.ac.uk

I am grateful to the Socio-Legal Studies Association for funding this research through its small grants scheme and to the Crown Prosecution Service for granting me research access. Thanks also go to Dave Cowan, Gwynn Davis, Richard Young, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Copyright Cardiff University Law School 2006

ABSTRACT

This article examines prosecutions of health care professionals for gross negligence manslaughter following fatal errors committed in the course of their work. Unease has long surrounded the use of 'gross negligence' as a form of criminal liability, and particularly as it applies to health care professions operating in high-risk settings. The recent dramatic rise of such prosecutions calls for a closer understanding of the processes by which important prosecutorial decisions are made. In particular, this calls for an investigation into the exercise of discretion by prosecutors in interpreting the loosely defined and contested concept of gross negligence. This article analyses data obtained from a statistical analysis of 'medical manslaughter' cases and also from interviews with crown prosecutors. Discussion of the main findings leads to the conclusion that the offence of gross negligence manslaughter is incapable of any objective and fair measurement and ought to be abolished.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00365.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
JFCJ

Free access available to Juvenile and Family Court Journal for a limited time


SIGN UP NOW for 30 days of FREE online access!

IT'S TIME TO RENEW

JOLS

It’s time to renew your subscription to Journal of Law and Society.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Law
Law