If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Skin Research and TechnologyVolume 12 Issue 4, Pages 228 - 234 Published Online: 5 Oct 2006 © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 114K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Acyclovir concentrations in the skin of humans after a single oral dose assessed by in vivo cutaneous microdialysis Copyright Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006 KEYWORDS acyclovir • skin penetration • cutaneous microdialysis ABSTRACTBackground/purpose: Acyclovir is a synthetic deoxyguanosine analogue used in the treatment of certain viral diseases. This drug is effective primarily against Herpes simplex virus, Varicella zoster virus and to a lesser extent against Epstein–Barr virus and cytomegalovirus. The aim of the study was to determine the acyclovir concentrations in plasma and skin (cutaneous microdialysate) and to compare its penetration into real (skin) and theoretical peripheral compartment after administration of a single 0.4 g oral dose. Methods: To evaluate the skin concentrations of the examined agent in 10 healthy male volunteers linear microdialysis probes with 2 kDa molecular-weight cut-off were inserted intradermally and were perfused with Ringer solution up to 6 h after drug ingestion. Results: The mean maximum acyclovir concentrations in the plasma, skin and theoretical peripheral compartment were 3.16±0.86, 0.94±0.34 and 1.85±0.69 μmol/L, respectively, and were achieved after 1.6±0.4, 2.4±0.3 and 3.7±0.7 h. The degree of penetration into the real (skin) and theoretical peripheral compartment was 0.36±0.15 and 0.74±0.12, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant. Similarly, also, the maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration and area under the concentration–time curve differed significantly between the plasma and skin as well as between the skin and the theoretical peripheral compartment. Conclusions: In selected cases skin concentrations should be determined rather than those in blood plasma when studying the distribution of orally administered drugs. Evaluation of acyclovir concentrations in the skin cannot be replaced by the calculation of the theoretical peripheral compartment. Accepted for publication 12 July 2005 |