ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 257K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Constraints on mantle anelasticity from geodetic observations, and implications for the J2 anomaly
David Benjamin 1 , John Wahr 1 , Richard D. Ray 2 , Gary D. Egbert 3 and Shailen D. Desai 4
  1 Department of Physics and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0390, USA. E-mail: wahr@colorado.edu   2 Space Geodesy Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 20771   3 College of Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA   4 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Copyright 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 RAS
KEYWORDS
Earth rotation • Earth tides • J 2 anomaly • mantle anelasticity

ABSTRACT

We use geodetic observations of the Earth to constrain anelasticity in the Earth's mantle at periods between 12 hr and 18.6 yr. The observations include satellite laser ranging (SLR) measurements of 12 hr and 18.6 yr tides in the J2 component of the gravity field; space-based observations of tidal variations in the Earth's rotation rate; and optical and space-based measurements of the Chandler Wobble period and damping. These geophysical signals are mostly sensitive to the lower mantle. The results suggest the dissipative process could consist of a single absorption band that extends across seismic periods out at least as far as ∼20 yr. The results also require values of the anelastic parameter Q that are smaller than those required by seismic observations. We interpret this as evidence that Q in the lower mantle is frequency dependent. The frequency dependence suggested by the geodetic observations is reasonably consistent with laboratory measurements, though those measurements have only been done on rocks at upper mantle conditions. After fitting and removing the 18.6 yr tide from the SLR J2 results, we find that the 1998–2002 anomaly present in the original J2 observations is no longer a singular anomaly in the J2 residuals, but becomes one of a series of maxima in a quasi-decadal oscillation.


Accepted 2006 January 18. Received 2005 July 13; in original form 2005 July 13

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02915.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member