ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development

Volume 8 Issue 1, Pages 46 - 60

Published Online: 6 Jan 2006

© 2010 Wiley Periodicals



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 837K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Developmental regulation of skull morphology II: ontogenetic dynamics of covariance
Miriam Leah Zelditch a * , Jason Mezey b , H. David Sheets c , Barbara L. Lundrigan d , and Theodore Garland Jr. e
  a Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  b Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
  c Department of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY 14208, USA
  d Michigan State University Museum and Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  e Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
  *Author for correspondence (email: zelditch@umich.edu)
Copyright © 2006 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC.

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY Canalization may play a critical role in molding patterns of integration when variability is regulated by the balance between processes that generate and remove variation. Under these conditions, the interaction among those processes may produce a dynamic structure of integration even when the level of variability is constant. To determine whether the constancy of variance in skull shape throughout most of postnatal growth results from a balance between processes generating and removing variation, we compare covariance structures from age to age in two rodent species, cotton rats (Sigmodon fulviventer) and house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). We assess the overall similarity of covariance matrices by the matrix correlation, and compare the structures of covariance matrices using common subspace analysis, a method related to common principal components (PCs) analysis but suited to cases in which variation is so nearly spherical that PCs are ambiguous. We find significant differences from age to age in covariance structure and the more effectively canalized ones tend to be least stable in covariance structure. We find no evidence that canalization gradually and preferentially removes deviations arising early in development as we might expect if canalization results from compensatory differential growth. Our results suggest that (co)variation patterns are continually restructured by processes that equilibrate variance, and thus that canalization plays a critical role in molding patterns of integration.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.05074.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
EDE
SCIN
Asia Scientists Click Here
Sign up for Content Alerts
Sign up for Content Alerts