If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||
![]() AnaesthesiaVolume 60 Issue 2, Pages 172 - 179 Published Online: 10 Jan 2005 Journal compilation © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 119K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking A programme for reducing smoking in pre-operative surgical patients: randomised controlled trial* *Presented in part at the 6th Biannual Behavioural Research in Cancer Control Conference; Newcastle, NSW, Australia: April, 2002; at the 14th Annual Australian Health Promotion Association Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia: June, 2002; and at the 7th Biannual Behavioural Research in Cancer Control Conference, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, June, 2004. Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Summary
We assessed the efficacy of a comprehensive programme for stopping smoking in 210 smokers scheduled for surgery, before admission and 3 months after attending a pre-operative clinic. Participants were randomly allocated to receive an intervention incorporating nicotine replacement therapy for patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day ('dependent smokers'), or to a control group to receive usual care. Dependent smokers allocated to the intervention group were more likely to report abstinence before surgery than those allocated to receive usual-care (63 (73%) vs. 29 (56%), respectively; OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.0–4.8)), and 3 months after attendance (16 (18%) vs. 3 (5%), respectively; OR = 3.9 (95% CI 1.0–21.7). Accepted: 3 November 2004 |