ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies

JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies

Volume 43 Issue 4, Pages 851 - 875

Published Online: 31 Oct 2005

© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 615K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The Limits of a European Immigration Policy: Elite Opinion and Agendas within the European Parliament
GALLYA LAHAV 1 ANTHONY M. MESSINA 2
  1 State University of New York at Stony Brook   2 University of Notre Dame
Correspondence to  State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Political Science, Social and Behavioral Sciences, S755, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4392, USA, Tel: 631 632 7613 Fax: 631 632 4116, email: gallya.lahav@sunysb.edu
Correspondence to  University of Notre Dame, 204 Hesburgh Center for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, Tel: 574 631 3968 Fax: 574 631-6717, email: amessina@nd.edu
Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

AbstractReferences

Utilizing data from our surveys of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in 1992–93 and 2003–04, this article samples MEP opinion on immigration-related questions. Its central purpose is to discover if the positions of MEPs on immigration issues have evolved substantially over time and, if so, whether the direction of change supports the supposition that national and partisan orientations are gradually yielding to a consensual and European orientation on immigration-related issues. Our comparative and longitudinal analysis partially confirms that MEP opinion is becoming more consensual. Yet, despite the robust interest of MEPs in forging a common immigration policy, their support for communitarization continues to lag. Specifically, we find that, even as immigration-related issues have become more salient, a preference for having national governments regulate immigration policy has increased, particularly among MEPs from the traditional immigration-receiving countries.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00599.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies are pleased to sponsor a Lecture at this year’s European Union Studies Association conference,
23rd – 25th April.

Jolyon Howorth (Yale University), "The EU in the New World Order: Does Europe Need a 'Grand Strategy'?"
23 April 2009 12.30 - 1.30 pm

The lecture will be followed by a sponsored reception
23 April 2009 6.30 - 7.30 pm

IT'S TIME TO RENEW

JCMS

It’s time to renew your subscription to JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Global Policy
Politics