ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 106K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

In Vitro Evaluation of the 18 and 36 kg Securos Cranial Cruciate Ligament Repair System
Max N. Banwell, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS 1,2,3 , Sharon C. Kerwin, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS 1,2,3 , Giselle Hosgood, BVSc, MS, PhD, Diplomate ACVS 1,2,3 , Cheryl S. Hedlund, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS 1,2,3 , and John B. Metcalf, PhD, FICE 1,2,3
  1 From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University, School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, LA ,   2 the Department of Veterinary Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX , and   3 the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Correspondence to  Address reprint requests to Sharon C. Kerwin, DVM, Diplomate ACVS, Department of Veterinary Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843. E-mail: skerwin@cvm.tamu.edu

 This study was funded by the Department of Clinical Sciences VCS CORP Funds, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

 Presented in part at the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Symposium, Washington, DC, October 9-12, 2003.

Copyright © Copyright 2005 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons
KEYWORDS
Securos Cranial Cruciate Ligament Repair System • cranial cruciate ligament • nylon leader line • mechanical testing • load to failure • static test • cyclic test

ABSTRACT

Objective—To evaluate the mechanical properties of the 18 and 36 kg Securos Cranial Cruciate Ligament Repair System.

Study Design—In vitro mechanical evaluation.

Sample Population—Loop constructs of 18, 27, and 36 kilogram test (kgt) nylon leader line (NLL) secured with Securos® crimp–clamps (SCC, n=40 per NLL test weight) or by a clamped square knot (CSK; n=40/NLL test weight).

Methods—The 36 kg SCC were used for the 27 and 36 kgt NLL, and 18 kg SCC were used for the 18 kgt NLL. Loop constructs were mounted on a material testing machine, and distracted at 500 mm/min for static tests, and for cyclic tests at 500 mm/min to a distraction limit of 6 mm (18 kgt) or 7.5 mm (27 and 36 kgt) for 49 cycles, until failure. Constructs were tested at 20°C except for 1 group of 27 kgt CSK loops tested at 40°C. Load at failure, elongation, and stiffness was recorded and compared between groups under static or cyclic testing conditions.

Results—All 27 and 36 kgt loops failed by disruption of NLL contained within the knot or crimp–clamp, whereas 18 kgt SCC loops failed by the NLL pulling through the crimp-clamp. The 18 kg SCC loops had considerable variability in ultimate load and elongation (coefficient of variation 29.6% and 18.3%, respectively). There was no significant difference in elongation between 27.3 kgt CSK loops tested at 20°C and 40°C. Generally, in both static and cyclic testing, SCC constructs formed with 27.3 or 36.4 kgt NLL performed as well or better than CSK constructs, resulting in loops that were strong, underwent minimal elongation, and had high stiffness.

Conclusion—The results support use of the 36 kg Securos® system but not the 18 kg Securos® system (with the clamp and crimping device used). The significantly lower load required for failure, slippage through the clamp, and substantial variability suggested that the crimp tube diameter or the crimping device tested may be inappropriate for use with 18 kgt NLL.

Clinical Relevance—Surgeons should be aware that crimp–clamp design is important in controlling suture slippage or breakage within the clamp, and that novel systems should undergo mechanical testing with the size suture material they are intended to secure before clinical use.


Submitted August 2004; Accepted February 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1532-950x.2005.00042.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Free Issue

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign up for E-Alerts

Vet Updates on Twitter

Free Trial

Now Available
Veterinary Surgery EarlyView

Veterinary Surgery

Now offering EarlyView

Read articles accepted into Veterinary Surgery before they publish in print!

Visit Early View