ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Indoor Air

Indoor Air

Volume 15 Issue 6, Pages 393 - 401

Published Online: 4 Jul 2005

© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 168K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Ventilation in public housing: implications for indoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations
A. Zota, G. Adamkiewicz, J. I. Levy, J. D. Spengler
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence to A. Zota,
Harvard School of Public Health,
Landmark Building-401 Park Drive, Room 409,
Boston, MA 02215, USA
Tel.: 617-384-8827
Fax: 617-384-8859
e-mail: azota@hsph.harvard.edu
Copyright 2005 Blackwell Munksgaard
KEYWORDS
Nitrogen dioxide • Air exchange rates • Ventilation • Indoor air quality • Public housing • Multi-family housing

ABSTRACT

Abstract Although elevated nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposures may exacerbate asthma, few studies have examined indoor NO2 levels in low-income, urban neighborhoods, where asthma prevalence is high. As part of the Healthy Public Housing Initiative, NO2 was measured in 77 homes within three Boston public housing developments, using Palmes tubes placed in the kitchen, living room, and outdoors. Air exchange rates (AERs) were assessed using a perfluorocarbon tracer technique. Overall NO2 levels were [mean (ppb) ± s.d.]: kitchen (43 ± 20, n = 100), living room (36 ± 17, n = 102), outdoor (19 ± 6, n = 91). Indoor NO2 levels were significantly higher in the heating season (living room: 43 ppb vs. 26 ppb, kitchen: 50 ppb vs. 33 ppb), while AERs were significantly lower in the heating season (medians 0.49/h vs. 0.85/h). Significant univariate predictors of indoor concentrations include: outdoor NO2 levels, AERs, and occupancy. AERs and outdoor NO2 remained significant in multivariate models (P < 0.05). A dummy variable for supplemental heating with gas stove was not significant (P = 0.14), but had a large, positive coefficient. Indoor NO2 levels in this cohort are higher than those generally reported in residential US settings, associated in part with increased gas stove usage and decreased AERs during the heating season.

Practical Implications

Indoor air quality is mainly a function of outdoor concentrations, indoor sources, ventilation, and residential behavior. Indoor exposures to nitrogen dioxide and other combustion pollutants may be elevated within low-income housing developments due to the presence of multiple sources, poor ventilation, small apartment size, and behavioral responses to apartment conditions (e.g. supplemental heating with gas stove). This information may be used by housing authorities and other landlords to decrease potential environmental stressors, through interventions such as source substitution and improved ventilation, particularly for sensitive sub-populations such as asthmatics.


Received for review 30 December 2004. Accepted for publication 11 May 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00375.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Free online access
Click here
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now