ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Plant Species Biology

Plant Species Biology

Volume 20 Issue 1, Pages 33 - 39

Published Online: 10 Mar 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for the Study of Species Biology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 79K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Reproductive biology and pollinator limitation in a deceptive orchid, Serapias vomeracea (Orchidaceae)
GIUSEPPE PELLEGRINO*, DOMENICO GARGANO, MARIA ELENA NOCE* and ALDO MUSACCHIO*
  *Dipartimento di Ecologia and   Orto Botanico, Università della Calabria, I-87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Cosenza, Italy
Correspondence to  Giuseppe Pellegrino
Email: giuseppe.pellegrino@unical.it
Copyright 2005 The Society for the Study of Species Biology
KEYWORDS
breeding system • Coleoptera • hand-pollination • pollinator limitation • reproductive success

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences

Deceptive orchid species that offer no floral rewards to pollinators often experience pollinator limitation. Serapias vomeracea is considered a particular example of terrestrial orchids using deceptive strategies because its sepals, petals and the lateral lobes of the hypochile form a small tube imitating a little hole that the insects use to rest. The pollination biology and breeding system were investigated in two populations of S. vomeracea in order to examine the extent of pollinator limitation. Visiting insects were immobile in the Serapias flowers during the early morning and late evening. The main pollinators were Oedemeridae and Lymexylidae (Coleoptera), but Hymenoptera (Ceratina, Eucera, Osmia) were also observed. Fruit set did not vary in response to floral display size, suggesting that variations in flower number per inflorescence and plant height were not responsible for attracting pollinators and thus reproductive success. Although S. vomeracea is self-compatible, bagged inflorescences produced no fruits. Artificial pollination resulted in 95–100% fruit set by induced autogamy, 95–100% by geitonogamous pollination and 90–95% by xenogamous pollination. Fruit set in the open-pollinated control was 13–18%. Fruit production was not related to the size, number or position of flowers. Pollinator observation and supplemented hand-pollination indicated a positive relationship between fruit set and pollinator visitations in this species.


Received 19 February 2004; revision received 2 November 2004; accepted 2 November 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1442-1984.2005.00121.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here