ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 99K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A new software for measuring leaf area, and area damaged by Tetranychus urticae Koch
E. M. Bakr
Acarology Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Dokky, Giza, Egypt
Author's address: Ehab M. Bakr (corresponding author), Acarology Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Nady El-said St., Dokky, Giza, 12311, Egypt. E-mail: ehab@ehabsoft.com
Copyright 2005 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin
KEYWORDS
area • leaf • mite • software • symptom

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Measuring leaf area manually is a tedious and time-consuming process and it is inaccurate. In an attempt to make this process easier and more accurate, a new software namely 'Compu Eye, Leaf & Symptom Area' was developed. A standard green shape with a known area of 1.5 cm2 was used to evaluate the accuracy of the software. The measurements obtained were of high accuracy. Measurements varied between 1.4771 and 1.5095 cm2. Probabilities of t values were usually <0.01 and did not exceed 0.023. It was also observed that accuracy could be enhanced either by increasing scanner resolution and/or by decreasing measurement unit area. In order to evaluate the performance of the software, leaves with symptoms of mite injury were collected from six different plant species (squash, cucumber, green bean, vigna, dahlia and rose). Symptom area of each leaf was assessed manually and by the software. It was observed that the software was able to assess the symptom area accurately with no significant difference compared with manual measurement.


Ms. received: July 16, 2004; accepted: January 24, 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1439-0418.2005.00948.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here