If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||
![]() Geophysical Journal InternationalVolume 163 Issue 3, Pages 956 - 961 Published Online: 22 Nov 2005 Journal compilation © 2010 RAS Published on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 545K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Banana-doughnut kernels and mantle tomography Copyright 2005 The Authors Journal compilation © 2005 RAS KEYWORDS banana–doughnut kernels • global tomography • plumes ABSTRACTTheoretical analyses suggest that finite-frequency effects should be considered in tomographic inversions of seismic phase 'arrival times' measured with waveform cross correlation at relatively low frequencies. This has led to the development of so-called 'banana-doughnut [sensitivity] kernels'—hereinafter BDKs. Here we address a practical question: has the use of these kernels produced tomographic images of global mantle heterogeneity that are significantly better than those based on ray theory? A simple model comparison suggests that the answer is 'not yet'. The effect of BDKs on both the pattern and the amplitude of mantle wavespeed perturbations appears to be smaller than that of practical (and subjective) considerations (such as the level of damping, the weighting of different data sets, and the choice of data fit) and does not exceed realistic estimates of image uncertainty due to, for instance, errors in the data. By itself, the fact that the better theory has not yet resulted in significant model improvements does not imply that models based on BDKs are incorrect. Deep 'plumes' may very well exist, but the benificial effect of BDKs on the tomographic images (and on 'plume' identification in particular) has been overstated. Accepted 2005 September 27. Received 2005 September 27; in original form 2005 July 6 |