If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Journal of Evolutionary BiologyVolume 18 Issue 3, Pages 587 - 595 Published Online: 4 Feb 2005 Journal compilation © 2010 European Society for Evolutionary Biology Published on behalf of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB)
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 187K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Macroevolutionary trends in the Dinosauria: Cope's rule Copyright 2005 European Society for Evolutionary Biology KEYWORDS body size • clade selection • Cope's rule • dinosaurs • phylogenetically independent comparisons • supertrees Abstract
Cope's rule is the tendency for body size to increase over time along a lineage. A set of 65 phylogenetically independent comparisons, between earlier and later genera, show that Cope's rule applied in dinosaurs: later genera were on average about 25% longer than the related earlier genera to which they were compared. The tendency for size to increase was not restricted to a particular clade within the group, nor to a particular time within its history. Small lineages were more likely to increase in size, and large lineages more likely to decrease: this pattern may indicate an intermediate optimum body size, but can also be explained as an artefact of data error. The rate of size increase estimated from the phylogenetic comparisons is significantly higher than the rate seen across the fauna as a whole. This difference could indicate that within-lineage selection for larger size was opposed by clade selection favouring smaller size, but data limitations mean that alternative explanations (which we discuss) cannot be excluded. We discuss ways of unlocking the full potential usefulness of phylogenies for studying the dynamics of evolutionary trends. Received 26 October 2004; revised 5 November 2004; accepted 6 November 2004 |