If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Journal of Evolutionary BiologyVolume 18 Issue 4, Pages 1050 - 1059 Published Online: 21 Mar 2005 Journal compilation © 2010 European Society for Evolutionary Biology Published on behalf of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB)
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 148K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium Copyright 2005 European Society for Evolutionary Biology KEYWORDS dichogamy • female-phase duration • floral evolution • heritability • male-phase duration • protandry • sex allocation Abstract
Protandry (when male function precedes female) can enhance fitness by reducing selfing and increasing pollen export and outcrossed siring success. However, responses to selection on protandry may be constrained by genetic variation and correlations among floral traits. We examined these potential constraints in protandrous Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) by estimating genetic variation in male-phase duration and associated floral traits using a paternal half-sib design and selection experiment. Narrow-sense heritability of male-phase duration was estimated as 0.23 (SE ± 0.04) and was positively correlated with floral display. The selection experiment shortened male-phase duration 0.8 SD from the parental average of 17.0 h and lengthened it by 2.0 SD. Furthermore, fixed floral longevity caused a negative association between male- and female-phase durations. These results suggest that selection on male-phase duration is not limited by genetic variation. However, changes in male-phase duration may influence pollinators through correlated changes in floral display and reduced opportunities for pollen receipt during female phase. Received 15 November 2004; accepted 4 January 2005 |