ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

European Financial Management

European Financial Management

Volume 11 Issue 5, Pages 649 - 659

Published Online: 8 Nov 2005

© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 115K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Does Overconfidence Affect Corporate Investment? CEO Overconfidence Measures Revisited
Ulrike Malmendier 1 and Geoffrey Tate 2
  1 Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
email: ulrikem@stanford.edu

  2 Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
email: tate@wharton.upenn.edu
Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005
KEYWORDS
behavioural corporate financeCEO overconfidencecorporate investment
KEYWORDS
G14 • G31 • G32 • D80

Abstract

AbstractReferences

This article presents the growing research area of Behavioural Corporate Finance in the context of one specific example: distortions in corporate investment due to CEO overconfidence. We first review the relevant psychology and experimental evidence on overconfidence. We then summarise the results of Malmendier and Tate (2005a) on the impact of overconfidence on corporate investment. We present supplementary evidence on the relationship between CEOs' press portrayals and overconfident investment decisions. This alternative approach to measuring overconfidence, developed in Malmendier and Tate (2005b), relies on the perception of outsiders rather than the CEO's own actions. The robustness of the results across such diverse proxies jointly corroborates previous findings and suggests new avenues to measuring executive overconfidence.


Received: 28 February 2002; Accepted: 09 September 2002;
DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00302.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Accounting & Finance