ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Effect of vaccination against leptospirosis on the frequency, days to recurrence and progression of disease in horses with equine recurrent uveitis
Barton W. Rohrbach*, Daniel A. Ward, Diane V. H. Hendrix, Margaret Cawrse-Foss†‡ and Tammy D. Moyers
  *Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences and the   Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Correspondence to  Address communications to: Dr Barton W. Rohrbach Tel.: (865) 974–5760 Fax: (865) 974–5773 e-mail: brohrbac@utk.edu
 

Present address: Metropolitan Veterinary Hospital 1053 S. Cleveland-Masillon Road Akron, OH 44321, USA

Copyright © 2005 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists
KEYWORDS
equine recurrent uveitis • leptospirosis • randomized clinical trial • uveitis • vaccination

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES

Objective To evaluate the effect of vaccination against leptospirosis on frequency and days to recurrence of uveitis and progression of disease in horses with equine recurrent uveitis (ERU).

Animals Forty-one horses with ERU.

Procedure Horses were randomly assigned to experimental (vaccinated) or control groups. Vaccine containing six serovars of Leptospira or placebo was administered, an ophthalmic examination performed and blood samples drawn on days 0, 28, 180 and 365. Antibody titers were measured against each serovar. Recurrence of uveitis was verified by ophthalmic examination. Results of the initial and final ophthalmic examinations were compared and progression of disease defined as an increase in extent of synechiae, or development of new or progression of an existing cataract.

Results Vaccination increased the average geometric mean serum antibody titer from 225 on day 0, to 4077 and 593 on days 28 and 180, respectively. After the second vaccination, days to first recurrence was significantly longer (median 126 days; range 24–231 days) when compared with controls (median 86 days; range 14–192 days, P = 0.04). Recurrence of ERU was observed among 7/20 (35%) vaccinated horses and 12/21 (57%) controls; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.061, OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06, 1.07). More horses in the experimental group 13/20 (65%) experienced progression of disease when compared with controls 12/21(57%); however, this difference was statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.35).

Conclusions Vaccine significantly increased days to recurrence, but failed to slow the progression of disease. These data do not support the use of vaccination against leptospirosis as adjunct therapy for the routine treatment of horses with ERU.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1463-5224.2005.00367.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Special Issue
Veterinary Ophthalmology
Veterinary Ophthalmology


Cornea
Supplement

Vol. 12 #s1, 2009

Read this issue FREE online!

Free Issue

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign up for E-Alerts

Vet Updates on Twitter

Free Trial