ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

British Journal of Dermatology

British Journal of Dermatology

Volume 152 Issue 3, Pages 466 - 473

Published Online: 17 Mar 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 287K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Treatment of female pattern hair loss with oral antiandrogens
R. Sinclair*†, M. Wewerinke and D. Jolley§
  *University of Melbourne Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Melbourne, Australia
  Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  School of Medicine, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
  §School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence to Rodney Sinclair
E-mail: sinclair@svhm.org.au
 

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no potential conflict of or competing interests to disclose.

Copyright 2005 British Association of Dermatologists
KEYWORDS
androgenetic alopecia • androgenic • balding • baldness • cyproterone acetate • spironolactone

Summary

AbstractMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences

Background It has not been conclusively established that female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is either due to androgens or responsive to oral antiandrogen therapy.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of oral antiandrogen therapy in the management of women with FPHL using standardized photographic techniques (Canfield Scientific), and to identify clinical and histological parameters predictive of clinical response.

Methods For this single-centre, before–after, open intervention study, 80 women aged between 12 and 79 years, with FPHL and biopsy-confirmed hair follicle miniaturization [terminal/vellus (T/V) hair ratio ≤ 4 : 1] were photographed at baseline and again after receiving a minimum of 12 months of oral antiandrogen therapy. Forty women received spironolactone 200 mg daily and 40 women received cyproterone acetate, either 50 mg daily or 100 mg for 10 days per month if premenopausal. Women using topical minoxidil were excluded. Standardized photographs of the midfrontal and vertex scalp were taken with the head positioned in a stereotactic device. Images were evaluated by a panel of three clinicians experienced in the assessment of FPHL, blinded to patient details and treatment and using a three-point scale.

Results As there was no significant difference in the results or the trend between spironolactone and cyproterone acetate the results were combined. Thirty-five (44%) women had hair regrowth, 35 (44%) had no clear change in hair density before and after treatment, and 10 (12%) experienced continuing hair loss during the treatment period. Ordinal logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of response revealed no influence of patient age, menopause status, serum ferritin, serum hormone levels, clinical stage (Ludwig) or histological parameters such as T/V ratio or fibrosis. The only significant predictor was midscalp clinical grade, with higher-scale values associated with a greater response (P = 0·013).

Conclusion Eighty-eight percent of women receiving oral antiandrogens could expect to see no progression of their FPHL or improvement. High midscalp clinical grade was the only predictor of response identified. A placebo-controlled study is required to compare this outcome to the natural history of FPHL.


Accepted for publication 25 February 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06218.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter