If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Entomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataVolume 115 Issue 1, Pages 51 - 59 Published Online: 21 Apr 2005 Journal compilation © 2010 The Netherlands Entomological Society Published on behalf of The Netherlands Entomological Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 144K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Response of garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola, to plant volatiles: from screening to application Copyright © 2005 The Netherlands Entomological Society KEYWORDS field tests • green leaf volatiles • floral plant volatiles •
Phyllopertha horticola
• Coleoptera • Scarabaeidae • mass trapping • non-target insects • dispensers Abstract
Field tests were performed on a golf course and in an apple orchard to screen synthetic plant volatiles with respect to their attractiveness for the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola L. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), and to investigate the possible application of plant volatiles for garden chafer control. The chemicals tested were green leaf volatiles (GLV), terpenoids, and phenylpropanoids. Funnel traps baited with the GLV (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, 1-hexanol (Z)-3-hexenal, and hexanal captured more P. horticola than unbaited controls. Furthermore, traps baited with all tested floral terpenoids (i.e., geraniol, geranyl acetate, citronellol, linalool, and nerol) and phenylpropanoids (i.e., eugenol, anethol, isoeugenol, eugenyl acetate, and isoeugenyl acetate) captured more garden chafers than controls. Different dispenser types loaded once with a mixture of (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol (50%), geraniol (11.5%), eugenol (27%), and 2-phenylethyl propionate (11.5%) attracted P. horticola over a whole flight season. A commercially available membrane dispenser had the best properties, combining the highest number of captured beetles with a low release rate. A simple modification of the trap design, i.e., a reduction of the funnel outlet diameter, significantly reduced the capture of beneficial non-target insects (Apoidea), without influencing the number of captured garden chafers. A mass trapping experiment in the apple orchard revealed that the use of attractant traps significantly reduced the percentage of apples disfigured by feeding holes of adult garden chafers (control area: 18.9%, test area: 11.6%). The possible application of synthetic plant volatiles in mass trapping and monitoring approaches for garden chafer control is discussed. Accepted: 5 January 2005 |