ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Public Administration Review

Public Administration Review

Volume 65 Issue 2, Pages 180 - 190

Published Online: 25 Feb 2005

Copyright © 2010 The American Society for Public Administration



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 110K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects
Julia Melkers 1 Katherine Willoughby 2
  1 Julia Melkers is an associate professor of public administration at the University of Illinois–Chicago, where she teaches and conducts research on performance measurement and public management. She has worked with numerous governments on the development and use of performance measures and strategic planning processes. E-mail: jmelkers@uic.edu.   2 Katherine Willoughby is a professor of public administration in the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University, where she teaches and conducts research on public budgeting, public management, and public policy. She has trained and consulted with local, state, and federal government officials on public budgeting, financial management, and audit practices in the United States. E-mail: kwilloughby@gsu.edu.
Copyright 2005 by the American Society for Public Administration

ABSTRACT

While attention has been paid to a few cities and counties exhibiting effective performance measurement systems, most U.S. local governments have been active in the development and use of performance measurement for several decades. This research examines the effects of performance-measurement information on budgetary decision making, communication, and other operations of U.S. local governments. Data are drawn from a national survey of city and county administrators and budgeters that included nearly 300 governments. Findings indicate the use of performance measurement by local departments is pervasive, although survey respondents are less enthusiastic about measurement effectiveness. Study results show subtle distinctions between city and county officials in their use of performance measurement for budgetary purposes and processes. Research findings indicate the consistent, active integration of measures throughout the budget process is important in determining real budget and communication effects in local governments.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Hot Topic

Special Issue on David Sears

POPS

Political Psychology recently published a special Forum on David O. Sears' Ongoing Contribution to Political Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to offer free online access to all the articles from this special journal issue.

Start reading!

PUAR
Hot Topic
JPAM

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

“Using private demand studies to calculate socially optimal vaccine subsidies in developing countries”

Click here for FREE article access.

Politics