ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

American Journal of Political Science

American Journal of Political Science

Volume 49 Issue 4, Pages 924 - 938

Published Online: 27 Sep 2005

© 2010 Midwest Political Science Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 204K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs
Andy Baker 1
  1 Northeastern University
Correspondence to  Andy Baker is assistant professor of political science, Northeastern University, 301 Meserve Hall, Boston, MA 02115-5000 (a.baker@neu.edu).

Thanks to Jeffrey Ballou, Jeffry Frieden, Kenneth Greene, Alan Heston, Douglas Irwin, Jerry Jackson, Maria Luengo-Prado, Timothy McKeown, Edward Schatz, Ethan Scheiner, Lyle Scruggs, Adrian Wood, the anonymous reviewers, and members of the Harvard University Political Economy Discussion Group for assistance and comments on this article.

Copyright 2005 by the Midwest Political Science Association

ABSTRACT

Although the allure of consumption is the engine of globalization, political economists have tended to ignore varying consumer tastes as a potential source of beliefs about trade policy. This article develops a theory of trade policy preferences that adds the notion of varying consumer tastes to the standard labor-market application of the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model. The theory, which can explain trade preferences both across individuals and countries, is supported by an empirical analysis of survey data from 41 nations. Heavy consumers of exportables are found to be more protectionist than heavy consumers of imports and import-competing goods. Moreover, citizens in countries with expensive tradable goods see trade liberalization as a remedy to the rents they pay for protectionism. Other findings also support the more conventional labor-market side of the Heckscher-Ohlin model.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00164.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Call for Papers
POLP

Do you have a paper of wide interest in politics or policy? Submit it to Politics & Policy!

Politics & Policy uses a
state-of-the-art online submission and peer review system that will help bring your research to publication as quickly as possible!

CLICK HERE for submission details.

Special Issue
POPS

VIRTUAL ISSUE: Psychological Perspectives on Politics

Access this free virtual issue of Political Psychology that uses psychological theory and methods to explore important questions in political science.

Read now

Hot Topic

Special Issue on David Sears

POPS

Political Psychology recently published a special Forum on David O. Sears' Ongoing Contribution to Political Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to offer free online access to all the articles from this special journal issue.

Start reading!

Global Policy
Politics