ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 324K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Inter-vessel pitting and cavitation in woody Rosaceae and other vesselled plants: a basis for a safety versus efficiency trade-off in xylem transport
JAMES K. WHEELER 1 , JOHN S. SPERRY 1 , UWE G. HACKE 1 & NGUYEN HOANG 1
  1 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT 84112, USA
Correspondence to  John S. Sperry. Fax: +1 801 581 4668; e-mail: sperry@biology.utah.edu
Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
air-seeding • cavitation resistance • pit resistance • vessel length • water transport • xylem flow resistance • xylem structure and function

ABSTRACT

AbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONAPPENDIX

The hypothesis that greater safety from cavitation by air-seeding through inter-vessel pits comes at the cost of less porous pit membranes with greater flow resistance was tested . Sixteen vessel-bearing species were compared: 11 from the Rosaceae, four from other angiosperm families, and one fern. Unexpectedly, there was no relationship between pit resistance (and hence the prevailing membrane porosity) and cavitation pressure. There was, however, an inverse relationship between pit area per vessel and vulnerability to cavitation (r2 = 0.75). This suggests that cavitation is caused by the rare largest membrane pore per vessel, the average size of which increases with total pit area per vessel. If safety from cavitation constrains pit membrane surface area, it also limits vessel surface area and the minimum vessel resistivity. This trade-off was consistent with an approximately three-fold increase in vessel resistivity with cavitation pressure dropping from −0.8 to −6.6 MPa. The trade-off was compensated for by a reduction in the percentage of vessel wall pitted: from 10–16% in vulnerable species to 2–4% in resistant species. Across species, end-wall pitting accounted for 53 ± 3% of the total xylem resistivity. This corresponded to vessels achieving on average 94 ± 2% of their maximum possible conductivity if vessel surface area is constrained.


Received 15 November 2004; received in revised form 6 January 2005; accepted for publication 13 January 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01330.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Special Issue
Click here to read the Special Issue
Asia Scientists Click Here
Journal Backfiles