If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Journal of Time Series AnalysisVolume 26 Issue 5, Pages 631 - 668 Published Online: 11 Aug 2005 © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 374K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Comparing the CCA Subspace Method to Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods in the case of No Exogenous Inputs Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. KEYWORDS Linear systems • discrete time systems • subspace methods • asymptotic efficiency ABSTRACTAbstract. This paper deals with the CCA subspace algorithm proposed in Larimore [Proceeding of 1983 American Control Conference (1983) pp. 445–451], which constitutes an alternative to the classical criteria optimization based approach to the identification of linear dynamic models for a stationary process. Subspace algorithms for the estimation of linear models have been advocated mainly due to their numerical properties. A large variety of different subspace algorithms is known to provide strongly consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of the system under mild assumptions on the noise and the underlying true system. This paper shows that for certain versions of CCA described in the paper the estimates are asymptotically equivalent to pseudo maximum-likelihood estimates in the sense that the difference in the estimators multiplied by the square root of the sample size converges to zero (in probability). Therefore these versions of CCA are asymptotically efficient for Gaussian innovations. First Version received April 2005 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Biometrics |
| Biometrics increased its * Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report 2008 | |
![]() |
Teaching Statistics |
Want to share your knowledge with those teaching pupils aged 9 – 19? Do you have a paper of interest to those teaching statistics, mathematics or economics? | |
![]() | International Statistical Review |
See the Papers attracting early citation: | |