ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The perils of procrastination: effects of early vs. delayed detection and treatment of incipient Charcot fracture
E. Chantelau
 Diabetes Foot Clinic, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Rheumatology, Heinrich–Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Correspondence to  Prof. Dr E.Chantelau, Diabetes Foot Clinic, Diabetesambulanz MNR-Klinik, Heinrich–Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Postfach 10 10 07, D-40001 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Copyright © 2005 Diabetes UK
KEYWORDS
Charcot foot • diabetes • neuropathy • osteoarthropathy • total contact cast

Diabet. Med. (2005)

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionCompeting interestsReferences

Background  At the onset of acute diabetic Charcot foot, therapeutic intervention may be delayed because plain X-rays may not show fractures.

Aim of the study  To assess the clinical course of acute Charcot foot in 24 patients without evidence of definite fractures on the first X-ray after onset of symptoms, who were referred to the foot clinic for diagnosis and treatment either early or delayed, i.e. before or after definite fractures were detectable on repeat X-rays.

Patients and methods  Eleven patients were referred early (incipient Charcot foot, case group), and 13 patients were referred delayed (overt Charcot foot, control group). In the foot clinic, both groups were immediately treated with off-loading and total contact casting. After the healing process of the Charcot foot was complete, the extent of fractures and subsequent deformities were evaluated.

Results  Based on X-rays at the onset of symptoms, in 19 of the 24 patients the condition had been misdiagnosed prior to referral (in 11 patients as sprain injury). Additional imaging techniques (MRI, CT scan or bone scintigraphy) had been performed in 10 patients prior to referral. While these techniques had been used more frequently in the cases vs. the controls (P = 0.012), misdiagnosis was less frequent in the cases vs. the controls (P = 0.013). Only one out of 11 case patients developed extended foot fractures and severe deformity, vs. 12 out of 13 control patients (P < 0.001).

Conclusion  Early detection of incipient Charcot foot is facilitated by imaging techniques other than plain X-rays. Immediate off-loading of incipient Charcot foot appears to minimize fractures and incapacitating deformities.


Accepted 9 February 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01677.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member