If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volume 20 Issue 5, Pages 432 - 437

Published Online: 31 Mar 2005

© 2006 by the Society of General Internal Medicine. All rights reserved



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 103K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Poor Patient Comprehension of Abnormal Mammography Results
Leah S. Karliner, MD, 1,2 , Celia Patricia Kaplan, DrPH, MA, 1,2,3 , Teresa Juarbe, PhD, 2,4 , Rena Pasick, PhD, 1,3 , Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable, MD 1,2,3
  1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine,   2 Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities,   3 Comprehensive Cancer Center, and   4 Department of Family Health Care Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
 Address correspondence and requests for reprints to Dr. Pérez-Stable: 400 Parnassus Avenue, Room A-405, Box 0320, San Francisco, CA 94143-0320 (e-mail: eliseops@medicine.ucsf.edu).

 These results were presented in part at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting, Vancouver, Canada, May 2003.

Copyright © 2005 by the Society of General Internal Medicine. All rights reserved
KEYWORDS
abnormal mammography • patient-doctor communication • ethnicity • language barriers • communication barriers

ABSTRACT

Background: Screening mammography for women 50 to 69 years of age may lead to 50% having an abnormal study. We set out to determine the proportion of women who understand their abnormal mammogram results and the factors that predict understanding.

Methods: We surveyed 970 women age 40 to 80 years identified with abnormal mammograms from 4 clinical sites. We collected information on demographic factors, language of interview, consultation with a primary care physician, receipt of follow-up tests, and method of notification of index mammogram result. This study examines the following outcomes: the participant's report of understanding of her physician's explanation of results of the index mammogram, and a comparison of the radiology report to the participant's report of her index mammogram result. Multivariate models controlled for age, education, income, insurance status, and clinical site.

Results: The majority (70%) reported a "full understanding" of their physician's explanation of their abnormal mammogram, but a significant minority (30%) reported less than a full understanding (somewhat, not at all, did not explain). Among women of Asian ethnicity, only 63% reported full understanding. Asian ethnicity was a negative predictor (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 0.7), and consultation with a primary care physician was a positive predictor (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.3) of reported full understanding. Of the 304 women with a suspicious abnormality, only 51% understood their result to be abnormal. Women notified in person or by telephone were more likely than women notified in writing to understand their result to be abnormal (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.8).

Conclusion: Almost half of women with the most suspicious mammograms did not understand that their result was abnormal. Our data suggest that direct communication with a clinician in person or by phone improves comprehension.


Accepted for publication January 4, 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40281.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member