If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Learning Disabilities Research & PracticeVolume 20 Issue 1, Pages 50 - 57 Published Online: 11 Jan 2005 © 2009 The Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children Published on behalf of the Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 102K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking The Critical Role of Vocabulary Development for English Language Learners Copyright 2005 The Division for Learning Disablilities of the Council for Exceptional Children ABSTRACTEnglish language learners (ELLs) who experience slow vocabulary development are less able to comprehend text at grade level than their English-only peers. Such students are likely to perform poorly on assessments in these areas and are at risk of being diagnosed as learning disabled. In this article, we review the research on methods to develop the vocabulary knowledge of ELLs and present lessons learned from the research concerning effective instructional practices for ELLs. The review suggests that several strategies are especially valuable for ELLs, including taking advantage of students' first language if the language shares cognates with English; ensuring that ELLs know the meaning of basic words, and providing sufficient review and reinforcement. Finally, we discuss challenges in designing effective vocabulary instruction for ELLs. Important issues are determining which words to teach, taking into account the large deficits in second-language vocabulary of ELLs, and working with the limited time that is typically available for direct instruction in vocabulary. |