ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 155K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Are Export Promotion and Trade Liberalisation Good for Latin America's Poor?
Enrique Ganuza*, Samuel Morley**, Valeria Piñeiro**, Sherman Robinson*** Rob Vos
  *UNDP, New York, USA
  **IFPRI, 2033 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006–1002, USA
  ***University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
  Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, The Netherlands.
 Samuel Morley (s.morley@cgiar.org) is the corresponding author.

This is a shortened English version of a more detailed Spanish book chapter (available at http://www.undp.org/rblac/finaldrafts/sp/Capitulo3.pdf).

Copyright Overseas Development Institute, 2005

ABSTRACT

This article reports on a project for 16 Latin American countries, primarily carried out by in-country teams, that used country-specific but relatively standard CGE models linked to household microsimulation models to assess the impact of trade liberalisation, exchange-rate manipulation, capital inflows, and terms-of-trade changes on output, employment and poverty. The results indicate that, almost everywhere, liberalization increased output, reduced poverty, and had positive effects on employment or wages. Rising skilled-unskilled wage gaps in some countries led to increased income inequality. In most countries, alternative liberalization scenarios had similar positive effects. Skill differentials, however, rise in some countries and fall in others, depending on the export structure. Finally, capital inflows were expansionary and reduced poverty.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-7679.2005.00293.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Also of Interest
Disasters

Disasters Virtual Issues

View the latest Disasters Virtual Issues on:

Ethiopia
(September 2009)

Emerging Perspectives on the Politicisation of Reconstructing Conflict-Affected Countries
(July 2009)

Indian Ocean Tsunami
(February 2009)

IT'S TIME TO RENEW

DPR

It’s time to renew your subscription to Development Policy Review.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Development