ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 78K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

SURGICAL RESEARCH
Comparison of blue dye and isotope with blue dye alone in breast sentinel node biopsy
David B. Y. Syme , John P. Collins and G. Bruce Mann
  Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
 Correspondence: Associate Professor G. Bruce Mann, Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic. 3050, Australia.
Email: bruce.mann@mh.org.au

D. B. Y. Syme MB BS; J. P. Collins MB BS, FRACS, FACS; G. B. Mann MB BS, PhD, FRACS.

Copyright 2005 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
KEYWORDS
early breast cancer • false negative • sentinel lymph node biopsy • sentinel lymph node

ABSTRACT

Background:   Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is rapidly gaining acceptance as an alternative to axillary dissection (AD) in patients with early breast cancer. Debate continues regarding the optimum technique for sentinel node (SN) mapping. We have used our series of 364 SNBs to compare two different techniques.

Methods:   A retrospective review of patients undergoing SNB by surgeons in our breast service. Overall results were analysed, with particular attention to those having blue dye alone and those having blue dye in combination with radio-labelled colloid. SNs were analysed using haematoxylin−eosin and immunohistochemical staining.

Results:   SN identification rates were similar: 96% for dye alone and 89% for dye and colloid in combination. Twenty-one per cent of SN mapped with dye alone contained metastases, compared to 30% with dye and colloid in combination. The false-negative rate was correspondingly higher in the dye alone group (21 vs 2.8%).

Conclusion:   SNB using dye and colloid in combination was significantly superior to dye alone in this series. We advocate using both dye and colloid for intraoperative SN mapping.


Accepted for publication 13 March 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03531.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now