ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 113K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Efficacy, dose–response relationship and safety of once-daily extended-release metformin (Glucophage® XR) in type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate glycaemic control despite prior treatment with diet and exercise: results from two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies
K. Fujioka 1 *, R. L. Brazg 2 , I. Raz 3 , S. Bruce 4 , S. Joyal 4 , R. Swanink 5 and M. Pans 5
  1 Department of Endocrinology Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
  2 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
  3 Hadassah Diabetes Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  4 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, USA
  5 Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Waterloo, Belgium
Correspondence to   *Ken Fujioka, MD, Nutrition and Metabolic Research Center, 12395 El Camino Real, Suite 317, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA 92130, USA.
E-mail:
kfujioka@scrippsclinic.com
Copyright Blackwell Science, 2004
KEYWORDS
metformin • oral antidiabetic therapy • type 2 diabetes

ABSTRACT

Aim: The efficacy, dose–response relationships and safety of an extended-release formulation of metformin (Glucophage® XR) were evaluated in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of 24 and 16 weeks' duration, in patients with inadequate glycaemic control despite diet and exercise. Protocol 1 provided an evaluation of metformin XR at a commonly used dosage. Protocol 2 evaluated different dosages of metformin XR.

Methods: In Protocol 1, 240 patients were randomized to receive metformin XR 1000 mg once daily. or placebo in a 2 : 1 ratio for 12 weeks (patients could receive metformin XR 1500 mg during weeks 12–24 if required). In Protocol 2, 742 patients were randomized to receive metformin XR 500 mg once daily, 1000 mg once daily, 1500 mg once daily, 2000 mg once daily, 1000 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint in each study was the change from baseline in HbA1C at 12 weeks (Protocol 1) or 16 weeks (Protocol 2).

Results: Metformin XR reduced HbA1C in Protocol 1, with mean treatment differences for 1000 mg once daily vs. placebo of −0.7% at 12 weeks and −0.8% at 24 weeks (p < 0.001 for each). In Protocol 2, a clear dose–response relationship was evident at doses up to 1500 mg, with treatment differences vs. placebo of −0.6% (500 mg once daily), −0.7% (1000 mg once daily), −1.0% (1500 mg once daily) and −1.0% (2000 mg once daily). The efficacy of metformin XR 2000 mg once daily and 1000 mg twice daily were similar (mean treatment differences vs. placebo in HbA1C were −1.0% and −1.2%, respectively). More patients achieved HbA1C < 7.0% with metformin XR vs. placebo in Protocol 1 (29% vs. 14% at 12 weeks) and with once-daily metformin XR in Protocol 2 (up to 36% vs. 10% at 16 weeks). No significant changes in fasting insulin or body weight occurred. Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol improved (p < 0.05–p < 0.001) in metformin XR groups in Protocol 2. Metformin XR was well tolerated; gastrointestinal side effects were more common with metformin XR vs. placebo, but few patients withdrew for this reason (1.3% vs. 1.3% in Protocol 1 and 1.6% vs. 0.9% in Protocol 2).

Conclusions: Once-daily metformin XR presents an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for delivering metformin in a convenient manner, which supports good compliance with therapy.


Received 3 October 2003; returned for revision 22 January 2004; revised version accepted 15 March 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00369.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Food and Western Disease