If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() American Journal of TransplantationVolume 5 Issue 6, Pages 1553 - 1558 Published Online: 18 Apr 2005 © 2010 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 70K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Brief Communication The Economic Implications of Noninvasive Molecular Testing for Cardiac Allograft Rejection Copyright Blackwell Munksgaard 2005 KEYWORDS Endomyocardial biopsy • cost • heart transplantation • gene expression profiling • reimbursement • economics ABSTRACTEndomyocardial biopsy is the mainstay for monitoring cardiac allograft rejection. A noninvasive strategy—peripheral blood gene expression profiling of circulating leukocytes—is an alternative with proven benefits, but unclear economic implications. Financial data were obtained from five cardiac transplant centers. An economic evaluation was conducted to compare the costs of outpatient biopsy with those of a noninvasive approach to monitoring cardiac allograft rejection. Hospital outpatient biopsy costs averaged $3297, excluding reimbursement for professional fees. Costs to Medicare and private payers averaged $3581 and $4140, respectively. A noninvasive monitoring test can reduce biopsy utilization. The savings to health care payers in the United States can be conservatively estimated at approximately $12.0 million annually. Molecular testing using gene expression profiling of peripheral circulating leukocytes is a new technology that offers physicians a noninvasive, less expensive alternative to endomyocardial biopsy for monitoring allograft rejection in cardiac transplant patients. Received 16 November 2004, revised 19 January 2005 and accepted for publication 20 January 2005 |