If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||
![]() British Journal of Industrial RelationsVolume 44 Issue 4, Pages 605 - 628 Published Online: 15 Nov 2006 © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and London School of Economics
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 119K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Strength in Networks: Employment Rights Organizations and the Problem of Co-Ordination Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd/London School of Economics 2006 Abstract
In recent decades, alternative organizations and movements —'quasi-unions'— have emerged to fill gaps in the US system of representation caused by union decline. We examine the record of quasi-unions and find that although they have sometimes helped workers who lack other means of representation, they have significant limitations and are unlikely to replace unions as the primary means of representation. But networks, consisting of sets of diverse actors including unions and quasi-unions, are more promising. They have already shown power in specific campaigns, but they have yet to do so for more sustained strategies. By looking at analogous cases, we identify institutional bases for sustained networks, including shared information platforms, behavioural norms, common mission and governance mechanisms that go well beyond what now exists in labour alliances and campaigns. There are substantial resistances to these network institutions because of the history of fragmentation and autonomy among both unions and quasi-unions; yet we also identify positive potential for network formation. Final version accepted on 17 May 2006. |
|