|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||
  Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyVolume 87 Issue 1, Pages 1 - 11 Published Online: 24 Feb 2006 Journal compilation © 2009 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 91K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  NATURALISM AND THE PARADOX OF REVISABILITY Copyright © 2006 The Author Journal compilation
© 2006 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ABSTRACTAbstract: This paper examines the paradox of revisability. This paradox was proposed by Jerrold Katz as a problem for Quinean naturalised epistemology. Katz employs diagonalisation to demonstrate what he takes to be an inconsistency in the constitutive principles of Quine's epistemology. Specifically, the problem seems to rest with the principle of universal revisability which states that no statement is immune to revision. In this paper it is argued that although there is something odd about employing universal revisability to revise itself, there is nothing paradoxical about this. At least, there is no paradox along the lines suggested by Katz. | 
| |||||||
