|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||
  Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyVolume 87 Issue 1, Pages 96 - 125 Published Online: 24 Feb 2006 Journal compilation © 2009 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 142K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  HOW TO ARGUE FOR THE VALUE OF HUMANITY Copyright © 2006 The Author Journal compilation
© 2006 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ABSTRACTAbstract: Significant effort has been devoted to locating a good argument for Kant's Formula of Humanity. In this paper, I contrast two arguments, based on Kant's text, for the Formula of Humanity. The first, which I call the 'Valued Ends' argument, is an influential and appealing argument developed most notably by Christine Korsgaard and Allen Wood. Notwithstanding the appeal and influence of this argument, it ultimately fails on several counts. I therefore present as an alternative the 'Autonomy' argument, which is largely inspired by the failings of the Valued Ends argument. | 
| |||||||
