If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Volume 108 Issue 4, Pages 643 - 668

Special Issue: Political Economy

Published Online: 3 Jan 2007

© 2009 the editors of the Scandinavian Journal of Economics



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Lobbying Bureaucrats*
Morten Bennedsen 1 Sven E. Feldmann 2
  1 Copenhagen Business School, DK-2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark mb.eco@cbs.dk
  2 Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA sven-feldmann@northwestern.edu
 

*We would like to thank Torben Iversen, Keith Krehbiel, Torsten Persson, Jim Snyder, Justin Wolfers, seminar participants at the University of Chicago, CEBR, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Business School, Institute for International Economic Studies in Stockholm, Stanford Graduate School of Business, the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs at Harvard, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments.

Copyright The editors of the Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2006
KEYWORDS
Delegation • political institutions • interest group influence • divided government
KEYWORDS
D72 • D73 • H1

Abstract

Abstract
          I. Introduction
          II. The Model
          III. Bureaucratic Lobbying and Delegation
          IV. Comparing Interest Group Influence across Political Structures
          V. DiscussionReferences

We study how interest group lobbying of the bureaucracy affects policy outcomes and how it changes the legislature's willingness to delegate decision-making authority to the bureaucracy. We extend the standard model of delegation to account for interest group influence during the implementation stage of policy. We analyze how the decision to delegate changes when the bureaucratic agent is subject to external influence. The optimal degree of delegation as well as the extent to which interest groups influence policy outcomes differ depending on whether the system of government is characterized by unified or divided control. The result is a comparative theory of bureaucratic lobbying.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00473.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member