If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a
few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local
Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets.
In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be
functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise
these problems.
Additive partitioning of diversity across hierarchical spatial scales in a forested landscape
SHIBICHANDY, DAVID J.GIBSON and PHILIP A.ROBERTSON
Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Department of Plant Biology and Center for Ecology, Carbondale, IL 62901–6509, USA
Correspondence: David Gibson, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Department of Plant Biology and Center for Ecology, Carbondale, IL 62901–6509, USA.
α diversity • β diversity • γ diversity • information theory • landscape ecology • partitioning • scales
Journal of Applied Ecology (2006) 43, 792–801
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01178.x
ABSTRACT
1.
Ecological phenomena exist at multiple scales, but measurements of diversity frequently consider only the smallest scale, that of the original sample plots. Additive partitioning of diversity allows multiple, hierarchical spatial scales of analysis to reveal the scale at which diversity is maximized.
2.
We examined the spatial partitioning of diversity across 378 permanent plots established in 10 7–369-ha research natural areas (RNA) in the 294 455-ha Shawnee National Forest, Illinois, USA. Diversity (richness and Shannon's and Simpson's indices) was partitioned across four spatial scales, i.e. within and between plots, and between RNA and natural divisions (corresponding to α and three levels of β diversity), for two strata of vegetation (trees and woody understorey).
3.
For both strata, the highest contribution to diversity measured as species richness was between plots and between RNA. Diversity was lower than expected within plots, although Simpson's and Shannon's indices achieved their maximum values at this scale. However, Shannon's index values were higher than Simpson's index values at the between-RNA scale and for all strata, indicating that the most common species were found at this scale.
4.
There was a simple asymptotic relationship between plot occupancy and local abundance, suggesting high colonization rates and rapid colonization of open habitat indicative of a wide niche breadth of the most abundant species.
5.
Synthesis and applications. The implications of these findings are that maximum diversity across a forested landscape is not necessarily at the scale of sampling (i.e. within plots) but may be at higher scales corresponding to larger landscape units. Moreover, the largest contribution of richness to total diversity occurred at a larger scale than diversity expressed using measures based upon information theory, which incorporate species abundance and evenness. Conservation efforts seeking to preserve diversity must identify and target the correct scales to allow effective management. In this study, management at and within the RNA represents the most appropriate scale for conserving maximum diversity.
Received 1 December 2005; final copy received 16 February 2006 Editor: Rob Freckleton
This Virtual Issue accompanies our latest Special Profile: Challenges and Prospects for Applied Ecology in China, now available online
Become a member of the
Meeting registration discounts, member newsletter, grants, low-cost journal access and much more… all for just £40 (£20 for students and retired members).