ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 247K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Sink habitats can alter ecological outcomes for competing species
SEBASTIAN J. SCHREIBER* and MOLLY KELTON†‡
  *Department of Mathematics and Institute for Integrative Bird Behaviour Studies, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA; and   Vassar College, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 12604–3131, USA
 Correspondence: Sebastian J. Schrieber, Department of Mathematics and Institute for Integrative Bird Behaviour Studies, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187–8795, USA. E-mail: sjschr@wm.edu
 

Current address: Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112–0090, USA.

Copyright © 2005 British Ecological Society
KEYWORDS
competition • population dynamics • sink-mediated coexistence

Journal of Animal Ecology (2005)

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00996.x

Summary

AbstractIntroductionGeneral model formulationCompetitive exclusion in a homogeneous environmentCompetition with a competitive refugeAppendix E: a discrete version of the competitive refuge model
  • 1. 

    Species often compete for breeding sites in heterogeneous landscapes consisting of sources and sinks. To understand how the presence or absence of sink breeding sites influence ecological outcomes, we extend Pulliam's source–sink model to competing species.

  • 2. 

    In a homogeneous landscape consisting of source sites, we prove that one species, the 'superior' competitor, competitively excludes the other. Dominance is determined by a simple rule: the species that at equilibrium acquires new breeding sites at a faster rate dominates.

  • 3. 

    We prove that the inclusion of sink sites can alter this ecological outcome by either mediating coexistence, reversing competitive dominance, or facilitating a priority effect.

  • 4. 

    Sink-mediated coexistence requires the species to exhibit asymmetries in acquiring sink sites, the 'inferior' species to have a competitive advantage on sink sites and the ratio of sink to source sites be sufficiently low.

  • 5. 

    For example, if the sink breeding sites are competitive refuges for the 'inferior' competitor and not too low in quality, coexistence occurs if the number of sink sites lies below a threshold. Alternatively, when the number of sink sites exceeds this threshold, competitive dominance is reversed and the 'superior' competitor is displaced.

  • 6. 

    Counter-intuitively, despite being unable to support species in isolation, sink habitats embedded in a geographical mosaic of sources and sinks can enhance biodiversity by mediating coexistence or alter species composition by reversing competitive interactions.


Received 29 February 2004; accepted 13 December 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00996.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


In Focus


Read the Latest Review Papers

Latest review paper:

Analysis of variance with unbalanced data: an update for ecology & evolution
Andy Hector, Stefanie von Felten and Bernhard Schmid

Free online throughout 2010
Sign up here
Become a member of the

BES member benefits

Meeting registration discounts, member newsletter, grants, low-cost journal access and much more… all for just £40 (£20 for students and retired members).

Click Here