ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 118K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis
JANNE BENGTSSON , JOHAN AHNSTRÖM and ANN-CHRISTIN WEIBULL*
 Department of Ecology and Crop Production Science, Section for Landscape Ecology, SLU, Box 7043, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
 Correspondence: Janne Bengtsson, Department of Ecology and Crop Production Science, Section for Landscape Ecology, SLU, Box 7043, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden (fax + 46 18 673430; e-mail Jan.Bengtsson@evp.slu.se).
 

*Present address: Swedish Environmental Protection Board, SE-106 48 Stockholm, Sweden.

Copyright © 2005 British Ecological Society
KEYWORDS
density • diversity • farming systems • organic farming • species richness

Journal of Applied Ecology (2005)

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x

Summary

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences
  • 1. 

    The efficiency of agricultural subsidy programmes for preserving biodiversity and improving the environment has been questioned in recent years. Organic farming operates without pesticides, herbicides and inorganic fertilizers, and usually with a more diverse crop rotation. It has been suggested that this system enhances biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We analysed the effects of organic farming on species richness and abundance using meta-analysis of literature published before December 2002.

  • 2. 

    Organic farming usually increases species richness, having on average 30% higher species richness than conventional farming systems. However, the results were variable among studies, and 16% of them actually showed a negative effect of organic farming on species richness. We therefore divided the data into different organism groups and according to the spatial scale of the study.

  • 3. 

    Birds, insects and plants usually showed an increased species richness in organic farming systems. However, the number of studies was low in most organism groups (range 2–19) and there was significant heterogeneity between studies. The effect of organic farming was largest in studies performed at the plot scale. In studies at the farm scale, when organic and conventional farms were matched according to landscape structure, the effect was significant but highly heterogeneous.

  • 4. 

    On average, organisms were 50% more abundant in organic farming systems, but the results were highly variable between studies and organism groups. Birds, predatory insects, soil organisms and plants responded positively to organic farming, while non-predatory insects and pests did not. The positive effects of organic farming on abundance were prominent at the plot and field scales, but not for farms in matched landscapes.

  • 5. 

    Synthesis and applications. Our results show that organic farming often has positive effects on species richness and abundance, but that its effects are likely to differ between organism groups and landscapes. We suggest that positive effects of organic farming on species richness can be expected in intensively managed agricultural landscapes, but not in small-scale landscapes comprising many other biotopes as well as agricultural fields. Measures to preserve and enhance biodiversity should be more landscape- and farm-specific than is presently the case.


Received 15 March 2004; final copy received 29 November 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Editor's Choice
Applied Ecology in Asia

Read our Virtual Issue on Applied Ecology in Asia free online

Virtual Issue

This Virtual Issue accompanies our latest Special Profile: Challenges and Prospects for Applied Ecology in China, now available online

Click to read the Virtual Issue
Free online throughout 2010
Sign up here
Become a member of the

BES member benefits

Meeting registration discounts, member newsletter, grants, low-cost journal access and much more… all for just £40 (£20 for students and retired members).

Click Here