ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Microscopy

Journal of Microscopy

Volume 218 Issue 1, Pages 6 - 8

Published Online: 30 Mar 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 Royal Microscopical Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 80K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
A review of the article: Comments on the shortcomings of predicting the precision of Cavalieri volume estimates based upon assumed measurement functions, by Edmund Glaser
L. M. CRUZ-ORIVE & M. GARCÍA-FIÑANA*
  Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computation, Faculty of Sciences, University of Cantabria, Avda. Los Castros s/n, E−39005 Santander, Spain
  *Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, U.K.
 Correspondence to: Professor L. M. Cruz-Orive. Tel.: +34 942 20 14 24; fax: +34 942 20 14 02; e-mail: lcruz@matesco.unican.es
Copyright © 2005 The Royal Microscopical Society

ABSTRACT

No Abstract

Received 20 December 2004; accepted 12 January 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01460.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors
Request ReprintReprint Request

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member

Search in this Title

Journal of Microscopy

Search by Citation




Go
 

Sign-up for Content Alerts
Asia Scientists Click Here
First Impact Factor
Laser & Photonics Reviews

Laser & Photonics Reviews

Excellent first Impact Factor:

          4.357*

It makes it right from the start the #2 journal in Optics and immediately positions it as one of the Top 10 journals in both categories, Condensed Matter and Applied Physics.

* 2008 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2009)

Go to the journal
Sign up for Content Alerts