If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Journal of MicroscopyVolume 214 Issue 1, Pages 80 - 88 Published Online: 23 Mar 2004 Journal compilation © 2010 Royal Microscopical Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 488K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Comparison of conventional and microwave-assisted processing of mouse retinas for transmission electron microscopy Copyright © 2004 The Royal Microscopical Society KEYWORDS Artefacts • fixation methods • photoreceptor cells • ultrastructure Summary
Conventional fixation and processing of mammalian retinal tissues for transmission electron microscopic (TEM) examination is slow and produces ultrastructural artefacts in the photoreceptor cell layer. Among these artefacts are gaps between photoreceptor outer segment disc membranes and between photoreceptor cells in the region of the retina where the cell nuclei are located. A study was undertaken to determine whether a much more rapid microwave-assisted fixation and processing protocol would have an effect on the quality of ultrastructural preservation of the retina, particularly on the photoreceptor cell artefacts. The overall ultrastructural preservation of the retina was similar for the conventional and microwave-assisted techniques. However, the magnitudes of the photoreceptor artefacts were significantly reduced when microwave irradiation was used during primary fixation and processing. It is clear that, at least for the retina, employing microwave irradiation during specimen preparation for TEM results in superior ultrastructural preservation with a substantial reduction in the time required for sample preparation. Received 11 June 2003; accepted 23 October 2003 |